Should Government Abolish PTPTN Loans?

Once again, PTPTN (Malaysia National Higher Education Loan) came to the limelight lately with the wrong reasons. In conjunction with this, Finance Malaysia did a survey on Facebook Page asking our fans "Should Government Abolish PTPTN Loans?", and guess the answer given by majority of them? NO.


Emmm... What does this mean? It's pretty clear that majority of us thinks that PTPTN should be continue for the following reasons:

  1. There is no FREE lunch in this world
  2. Borrowers should repay what he borrows
  3. The scheme did already help many financially distressed students pursuing tertiary education

Thanks for your participation in the survey. Yet, many readers keep asking Finance Malaysia, our view on this matter. Before answering you, we also highlighted that this blog is of freedom of speech, we're not political driven blog, and we tend to be political-neutral in writing. Below is our view on this issue:



  1. We agreed that there is no free lunch, especially in Malaysia. We should change our mentality that Government owe us this and that things. We must put in our own efforts to make things happen, and Government's role is to facilitate the process to become easier and smoother. This is why PTPTN loan was offered at the beginning.

  2. Regarding the interest rate charged, it's a mere 3% only. Does it really sky high? Definitely not. Why PTPTN charged 3%? This was because our inflation rate is around that figure. If you take last year inflation rate of 3.5% into calculation, PTPTN are making losses actually, although we repay back with 3% interest rate.

  3. Without interest, anyone of us who qualify to go into varsities will take PTPTN loan, whether he/she is serious in his/her study or not. Why not borrow the money to spend, instead of study, if given free?

  4. Without interest, what is the incentive for student to repay back the borrow amount as soon as possible? Without interest, I will be the one who use whatever money I have now to invest, do business, buy gadgets... last is PTPTN. Agree?

  5. We believe this is one of the agenda purposely created by certain political parties to fish young voters, saying that they will abolish and cleared their outstanding PTPTN loan once they formed the new Government. (Please be neutral on this matter, then only think)

  6. By writing-off the outstanding PTPTN loans amounting to billions of ringgit, Malaysia sure will went into financially distressed level. Then, all of the subsidies will be removed, public sector salary will be cut, all of us will protest because of this. Do you really want this to happen?


Anyway, this is one of the interesting preview running up to the anticipated general election. Finance Malaysia hopes that political parties from both sides should focus on things that really can benefiting the country. What's the point to form a new Government that will go into bankruptcy?


Before ending this posts, we must highlighted here that Government must clear the doubts by sorting it out fast. If not, many borrowers will wait and stop repayment in anticipating that Government will abolish it soon.

Another point was we lauded PTPTN's intention to reward those prompt and disciplined borrowers with a reduced 1% interest rate. However, why not PTPTN automatically reducing it without much hassle for borrowers to appeal? Now, borrowers must request > wait for revised terms and conditions agreement > print and sign > guarantors signatures > employers details > auto-deductions from salary > return back to PTPTN. Since these are eligible good paymasters, why not treati them automatically?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"You Can Keep Your Existing Health Insurance"

I wondered about this statement at the time Obama made it.  Clearly, by changing all the rules of health care insurance and mandating conformity, it was unlikely that the vast majority of Americans would not find themselves forced by 'The Affordable Care Act' to have to deal with a completely different health insurance plan and completely different set of health care providers. I now understand what Obama meant.   He was speaking to his immediate family and (politician) friends.  They are exempt from the "Affordable Care Act."  Clearly what he meant to say was: "if you are exempt from Obamacare, like me and my family, you can keep your existing health insurance."  He never meant to mislead.
Read more

Why Gold and Silver? Why Online Store?

Image
Are you first time gold and silver buyers? Why don't you invest in these popular metals? If you did so, you have had a wonderful investing experience after 2008 global financial crisis. But, do you really understand these metals? Were they really precious (especially now)? Traditionally, gold and silver were one form of exchange. Because of the invention of fiat money, they were being turned into some short of "back-up" currency , in case our fiat money system go burst. It's natural when things go wrong, gold and silver tends to appreciate in value. In other words, people hold precious metals to preserve the value of their assets. 3 Reasons Why Gold and Silver... Still hot in demand , especially by emerging affluent Chinese. Traditionally, Chinese loves gold. They bought it for events such as new born baby, new year, wedding and even funeral ceremony. Strengthening USD ??? Yes. It's a correct reason also. Why? Because of news that US going to stop QE3, USD is str...
Read more

Things We Now Know

The poor are losing ground in the new Obama world.  The facts are showing up even in the halls of collectivist extremes like the New York Times.  The rich are getting richer and poor are being locked in place.  Big government is throttling the economy and the hopes and dreams of lower and middle class Americans. Today's Wall Street Journal's article by Simon Constable lays out some of the simple and obvious facts of the Obama era: "The richest 20% of households account for 38% of spending, according to government data for 2011, the latest available.  Compare that with 2003 when the top earners spent 26% of the total."  The article goes on to say..."it could get even worse."  It will. Who really benefits when the regulators strangle the banks?  Do banks really need to get much more conservative in their lending practices?  Why does the government know best?  How far can you stretch the FDIC guarantees before American banking is simply a subsid...
Read more