Two cents for Government’s Talent Retaining Program

First, congratulates Talent Corp for continuing trying to achieve the objectives of bringing back Malaysian or foreign talent back home. Indeed, this was a very tough task, as Malaysians already implant the thinking inside. Every year, our "bright stars" migrate to other countries searching for their dream jobs.

Cartoon In: Economist, August 11, 2005.
Why it happens?
  • It was started when those bright graduates being in love with the countries they studied. Many of them pursue their degree in US, UK, and Australia. And, after they graduate, they became in love with these countries, and tend to get a job there, stay there, and forget here.
  • Highly specialized jobs are unavailable to these professional locally, such as doctors, engineer, scientists, new technology innovators… If you're hand phone innovator, would you join Apple or Nokia abroad or remain here?
  • Professional tends to feel proud by doing something that they can showcase their skills or capabilities. This is another reason for them to venture aboard, because Malaysia is not a niche nation for something unique. Example, fashion in France, soccer in UK, technology in US. No wonder Datuk Jimmy Choo, yet another proud Malaysian, found his success in UK.
Picture from www.frederatorblogs.com
How to prevent brain drain?

  • Improving our Universities to be on par with US, UK and Australia, so that Malaysians need not chase for overseas educations
  • Improving our living standard and lifestyle, especially in KL, to make our graduates proud of
  • Move up the value chain of businesses
  • Move towards high income nation (we're on the right track)
  • Identified our very own niche or selling point, and plan to develop it until recognized globally

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"You Can Keep Your Existing Health Insurance"

I wondered about this statement at the time Obama made it.  Clearly, by changing all the rules of health care insurance and mandating conformity, it was unlikely that the vast majority of Americans would not find themselves forced by 'The Affordable Care Act' to have to deal with a completely different health insurance plan and completely different set of health care providers. I now understand what Obama meant.   He was speaking to his immediate family and (politician) friends.  They are exempt from the "Affordable Care Act."  Clearly what he meant to say was: "if you are exempt from Obamacare, like me and my family, you can keep your existing health insurance."  He never meant to mislead.
Read more

Why Gold and Silver? Why Online Store?

Image
Are you first time gold and silver buyers? Why don't you invest in these popular metals? If you did so, you have had a wonderful investing experience after 2008 global financial crisis. But, do you really understand these metals? Were they really precious (especially now)? Traditionally, gold and silver were one form of exchange. Because of the invention of fiat money, they were being turned into some short of "back-up" currency , in case our fiat money system go burst. It's natural when things go wrong, gold and silver tends to appreciate in value. In other words, people hold precious metals to preserve the value of their assets. 3 Reasons Why Gold and Silver... Still hot in demand , especially by emerging affluent Chinese. Traditionally, Chinese loves gold. They bought it for events such as new born baby, new year, wedding and even funeral ceremony. Strengthening USD ??? Yes. It's a correct reason also. Why? Because of news that US going to stop QE3, USD is str...
Read more

Things We Now Know

The poor are losing ground in the new Obama world.  The facts are showing up even in the halls of collectivist extremes like the New York Times.  The rich are getting richer and poor are being locked in place.  Big government is throttling the economy and the hopes and dreams of lower and middle class Americans. Today's Wall Street Journal's article by Simon Constable lays out some of the simple and obvious facts of the Obama era: "The richest 20% of households account for 38% of spending, according to government data for 2011, the latest available.  Compare that with 2003 when the top earners spent 26% of the total."  The article goes on to say..."it could get even worse."  It will. Who really benefits when the regulators strangle the banks?  Do banks really need to get much more conservative in their lending practices?  Why does the government know best?  How far can you stretch the FDIC guarantees before American banking is simply a subsid...
Read more